wild:wild_food

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision		 Previous revision
wild:wild_food [2026/04/22 05:55] – [Example 1: The cultivated landscapes of Turtle Island] Otto Haguewild:wild_food [2026/04/22 06:06] (current) – [What are the benefits of wild food?] Otto Hague
Line 103: Line 103:
  
 Plus it's free! Plus it's free!
 +
 +<WRAP center centeralign>
 +<figure>
 +{{personal_foraging_calendar.jpg?direct&300}}
 +<caption>
 +_A personal foraging calendar is built piece by piece, as you encounter wild foods in your landscape. They take information floating around in books and on the internet and ground-truth them in your landscape._
 +</caption>
 +</figure>
 +</WRAP>
  
 <WRAP center centeralign> <WRAP center centeralign>
Line 203: Line 212:
  
  
 +----
  
 ===== Wild Food Commons ===== ===== Wild Food Commons =====
Line 246: Line 256:
 </figure> </figure>
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
- 
  
 ### Example 2: Online knowledge sharing with fallingfruit.org ### Example 2: Online knowledge sharing with fallingfruit.org
Line 255: Line 264:
  
 I would encourage every private landowner reading this to put their food resources up on fallingfruit.org, to provide permission to their community to walk on their land and pick some of its bounty. I would encourage every private landowner reading this to put their food resources up on fallingfruit.org, to provide permission to their community to walk on their land and pick some of its bounty.
- 
- 
----- 
  
  
Line 268: Line 274:
 Moreover, the mature forest provides essential goods to the communities, disincentivising logging (Brown, 2001). The survival of the community and their forest are inextricably linked, enough to cultivate a feeling of //florestania//, or “forestizenship” (Barca, 2024). This is the kind of deep connection that is enabled by a foraging relationship, and ultimately protects the forest.  Moreover, the mature forest provides essential goods to the communities, disincentivising logging (Brown, 2001). The survival of the community and their forest are inextricably linked, enough to cultivate a feeling of //florestania//, or “forestizenship” (Barca, 2024). This is the kind of deep connection that is enabled by a foraging relationship, and ultimately protects the forest. 
  
- 
----- 
  
  
Line 330: Line 334:
  
   - Brown, I. F. (2001). Extractive Preserves and Participatory Research in as Factors in the Biogeochemistry of the Amazon Basin, in McClain, M. E., //The Biogeochemistry of the Amazon Basin//. Oxford University Press.   - Brown, I. F. (2001). Extractive Preserves and Participatory Research in as Factors in the Biogeochemistry of the Amazon Basin, in McClain, M. E., //The Biogeochemistry of the Amazon Basin//. Oxford University Press.
 +
 +  - Kimmerer, R. W. (2013). //Braiding Sweetgrass//. Milkweed Editions.
  
   - Pinzón Rueda, R., & Ruiz Murrieta, J. (1995). //Extractive Reserves//. IUCN - World Conservation Union.   - Pinzón Rueda, R., & Ruiz Murrieta, J. (1995). //Extractive Reserves//. IUCN - World Conservation Union.
  • wild/wild_food.1776837323.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2026/04/22 05:55
  • by Otto Hague