indy:independent_media

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision		 Previous revision
indy:independent_media [2026/03/10 12:41] – external edit 127.0.0.1indy:independent_media [2026/03/26 18:33] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
Line 1: Line 1:
-# Independent media+This topic is part of [[gt:digital|Digital & media]]. 
 +====== Independent media ======
  
  
Line 10: Line 11:
  
  
-## What is independent media?+===== What is independent media? =====
  
 It’s a form of communication that’s independent of external control that biases the content in favour of an elite. Independent media is free from state control, billionaire ownership and corporate advertising. Its aim is to provide content that is a) factually accurate; b) not biased towards elite interests; and c) often not reported in the mainstream, corporate media because it’s not in the interest of the elite for the public to know it. It’s a form of communication that’s independent of external control that biases the content in favour of an elite. Independent media is free from state control, billionaire ownership and corporate advertising. Its aim is to provide content that is a) factually accurate; b) not biased towards elite interests; and c) often not reported in the mainstream, corporate media because it’s not in the interest of the elite for the public to know it.
Line 25: Line 26:
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
  
-### Mainstream media+==== Mainstream media ====
  
 Newspapers don’t tend to make profits any more. The Sun and the Guardian lose huge amounts of money, others just break even, and the Mail makes money, but only from a barrage of celebrity photographs online, rather than news. They’re valuable for their propaganda influence, rather than profit. Rupert Murdoch, for example, is very open about his desire to be a ‘kingmaker’. Newspapers don’t tend to make profits any more. The Sun and the Guardian lose huge amounts of money, others just break even, and the Mail makes money, but only from a barrage of celebrity photographs online, rather than news. They’re valuable for their propaganda influence, rather than profit. Rupert Murdoch, for example, is very open about his desire to be a ‘kingmaker’.
Line 43: Line 44:
  
  
-### History+==== History ====
  
 Since the invention of the printing press, there has always been media produced by ordinary people, away from the centres of power, and this has accelerated in the age of the internet – see below. There are also organisations to support and develop independent media, like the [Media Reform Coalition](https://www.mediareform.org.uk/), who do a lot of research into ownership of the media. Since the invention of the printing press, there has always been media produced by ordinary people, away from the centres of power, and this has accelerated in the age of the internet – see below. There are also organisations to support and develop independent media, like the [Media Reform Coalition](https://www.mediareform.org.uk/), who do a lot of research into ownership of the media.
Line 60: Line 61:
  
  
-## What are the benefits of independent media?+===== What are the benefits of independent media? =====
  
 The main benefit is that independent media, unlike corporate or state media, don’t represent only the interests of the elite. They can question power, because again, unlike the corporate media, they don’t rely on a powerful elite for their existence. The main benefit is that independent media, unlike corporate or state media, don’t represent only the interests of the elite. They can question power, because again, unlike the corporate media, they don’t rely on a powerful elite for their existence.
  
-### Democracy+==== Democracy ====
  
 This has huge implications for [democracy](/demo/democracy). It’s not possible to have real democracy when most people get their information only from the powerful, in the interests of the powerful. This creates mainstream consent, so that those who dissent are then seen as ‘outsiders’. We have to have independent media that will question the powerful, or we can’t have a functioning democracy. This has huge implications for [democracy](/demo/democracy). It’s not possible to have real democracy when most people get their information only from the powerful, in the interests of the powerful. This creates mainstream consent, so that those who dissent are then seen as ‘outsiders’. We have to have independent media that will question the powerful, or we can’t have a functioning democracy.
Line 79: Line 80:
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
  
-### Accuracy+==== Accuracy ====
  
 Truth is also a casualty of the corporate media. There are various ‘filters’ that prevent you from getting the truth about the world. Ownership is perhaps the most important filter. In the UK, owners of the mainstream media are either the state, or billionaires. Another is advertising – the corporate media is funded by other corporations that have a vested interest in the media not publishing any negative stories about them. Truth is also a casualty of the corporate media. There are various ‘filters’ that prevent you from getting the truth about the world. Ownership is perhaps the most important filter. In the UK, owners of the mainstream media are either the state, or billionaires. Another is advertising – the corporate media is funded by other corporations that have a vested interest in the media not publishing any negative stories about them.
  
-### Data+==== Data ====
  
 There’s also an issue with data-mining. Data is now a very profitable tradeable commodity. Online corporate media harvest user data and sell it to businesses that will use it against those users, learning about behaviours and beliefs, playing on impulse and short-term desire to sell targeted products. We now have private ownership of information on what makes you you, in much more depth than has ever existed. If individuals want to sell their data in this way, fine – but as things stand, people’s data is being used secretively, for profit, without their consent. We need independent online media that allow users to control their data, or that don’t collect it at all. There’s also an issue with data-mining. Data is now a very profitable tradeable commodity. Online corporate media harvest user data and sell it to businesses that will use it against those users, learning about behaviours and beliefs, playing on impulse and short-term desire to sell targeted products. We now have private ownership of information on what makes you you, in much more depth than has ever existed. If individuals want to sell their data in this way, fine – but as things stand, people’s data is being used secretively, for profit, without their consent. We need independent online media that allow users to control their data, or that don’t collect it at all.
Line 99: Line 100:
  
  
-## What can I do?+===== What can I do? =====
  
 Choose your news sources wisely. Avoid the mainstream media, unless you’re after untrustworthy news and trivia, and don’t fall for for the few considered ‘the good guys’, like the billionaire-owned, mis-named ‘Independent’ newspaper, or the Guardian – funded by corporate advertising and owned by Scott Trust Ltd (registered in Bermuda so that they can avoid taxes, named to make people think that it's still a trust - it isn't) or the BBC, for the reasons outlined above. Choose your news sources wisely. Avoid the mainstream media, unless you’re after untrustworthy news and trivia, and don’t fall for for the few considered ‘the good guys’, like the billionaire-owned, mis-named ‘Independent’ newspaper, or the Guardian – funded by corporate advertising and owned by Scott Trust Ltd (registered in Bermuda so that they can avoid taxes, named to make people think that it's still a trust - it isn't) or the BBC, for the reasons outlined above.
Line 114: Line 115:
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
  
-### News sources+==== News sources ====
  
 Successful journalism, independent or not, requires skills and time that need to be recognised and paid for. As mentioned above, in the UK, there’s the [New Internationalist](https://newint.org/), and US organisations like [Democracy Now!](https://www.democracynow.org/) and the [Real News Network](https://therealnews.com/) have had long-term success too. Successful journalism, independent or not, requires skills and time that need to be recognised and paid for. As mentioned above, in the UK, there’s the [New Internationalist](https://newint.org/), and US organisations like [Democracy Now!](https://www.democracynow.org/) and the [Real News Network](https://therealnews.com/) have had long-term success too.
Line 135: Line 136:
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
  
-### Reliability+==== Reliability ====
  
 Once you’ve rejected the corporate media, you’ll have to work out which independent sources are reliable. After the [Leveson Inquiry](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leveson_Inquiry), press regulations were largely re-written by Paul Dacre, editor of the Daily Mail. The result was [weaker press regulation than](https://hackinginquiry.org/the-men-behind-ipso-part-2-paul-dacre/) [previously](https://hackinginquiry.org/the-men-behind-ipso-part-2-paul-dacre/) (that resulted in far fewer official complaints about the Mail, surprise surprise), and a not-very-reliable press regulator, IPSO. On the other hand, [IMPRESS](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IMPRESS), fully compliant with the recommendations of the Leveson Inquiry, is a reliable regulator. IMPRESS is also affordable / free for the public to take complaints to, and there are now moves to register all reliable independent media with it. Once you’ve rejected the corporate media, you’ll have to work out which independent sources are reliable. After the [Leveson Inquiry](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leveson_Inquiry), press regulations were largely re-written by Paul Dacre, editor of the Daily Mail. The result was [weaker press regulation than](https://hackinginquiry.org/the-men-behind-ipso-part-2-paul-dacre/) [previously](https://hackinginquiry.org/the-men-behind-ipso-part-2-paul-dacre/) (that resulted in far fewer official complaints about the Mail, surprise surprise), and a not-very-reliable press regulator, IPSO. On the other hand, [IMPRESS](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IMPRESS), fully compliant with the recommendations of the Leveson Inquiry, is a reliable regulator. IMPRESS is also affordable / free for the public to take complaints to, and there are now moves to register all reliable independent media with it.
Line 151: Line 152:
  
  
-### Social media+==== Social media ====
  
 Around 80% of people now get their news from social media, most of which is also owned by tax-avoiding, data-mining global corporations, beholden only to their shareholders, not their users. To maximise profit, they use algorithms that give users only what they like, which denies users the range of opinions required to understand the world, and produces tsunamis of fake news and conspiracy theories, as well as extreme political division. The business model is based on the dopamine hit of shares, likes and comments, which brings people back and satisfies advertisers and data purchasers. Around 80% of people now get their news from social media, most of which is also owned by tax-avoiding, data-mining global corporations, beholden only to their shareholders, not their users. To maximise profit, they use algorithms that give users only what they like, which denies users the range of opinions required to understand the world, and produces tsunamis of fake news and conspiracy theories, as well as extreme political division. The business model is based on the dopamine hit of shares, likes and comments, which brings people back and satisfies advertisers and data purchasers.
Line 166: Line 167:
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
  
-### Contributing+==== Contributing ====
  
 As well as consuming independent media, you can contribute to its output. To get greater insight and to gain skills, you could volunteer for an independent media organisation – either locally or nationally. Just contact them and see what they say. As well as consuming independent media, you can contribute to its output. To get greater insight and to gain skills, you could volunteer for an independent media organisation – either locally or nationally. Just contact them and see what they say.
Line 173: Line 174:
  
  
-## Further resources+===== Forum ===== 
 + 
 +This topic belongs to the section [[gt:digital|Digital & media]]. You can ask questions or add information on the corresponding [Forum section](https://forum.growingthecommons.org/t/digital). 
 + 
 +===== Further resources =====
  
 - [Bureau of Investigative Journalism](https://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/) - independent journalism made available to mainstream outlets to maximise audience - [Bureau of Investigative Journalism](https://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/) - independent journalism made available to mainstream outlets to maximise audience
Line 197: Line 202:
  
  
 +===== Related topics =====
  
-## Related topics+- [[comy:Community]] 
 +- [[coec:Commons economy]] 
 +- [[demo:democracy|The democracy problem]] 
 +- [[coop:Co-operatives]] 
 +- [[wiks:Wikis]]
  
  
-## Specialist curators of this topic+===== Specialist curators of this topic =====
  
  
  • indy/independent_media.1773146462.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2026/03/10 12:41
  • by 127.0.0.1