coec:commons_economy

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision		 Previous revision
coec:commons_economy [2025/12/06 14:23] – [Further resources] Dave Darbycoec:commons_economy [2026/04/02 12:48] (current) – Simon Grant
Line 1: Line 1:
-# Commons economy+This topic is part of [[gt:economy|Economy & finance]]. 
 +====== Commons economy ======
  
  
Line 12: Line 13:
  
  
-## What is a commons economy?+===== What is a commons economy? =====
  
 It’s an economy in which the essentials of life – housing, energy, land, food, water, transport, social care, the means of exchange etc. are owned in common, in communities, rather than by absentee landlords, corporations or the state. Commons have 3 parts: It’s an economy in which the essentials of life – housing, energy, land, food, water, transport, social care, the means of exchange etc. are owned in common, in communities, rather than by absentee landlords, corporations or the state. Commons have 3 parts:
Line 24: Line 25:
 We believe that a combination of the inherent social nature of humans, ancient commons practices, established commons principles and new commons ideas can help build a commons movement to challenge the current economy in a way that nothing else has or can. We believe that a combination of the inherent social nature of humans, ancient commons practices, established commons principles and new commons ideas can help build a commons movement to challenge the current economy in a way that nothing else has or can.
  
-### Elinor Ostrom+==== Elinor Ostrom ====
  
 You may have heard of [Garrett Hardin](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garrett_Hardin)'s famous essay, _the Tragedy of the Commons_, in which he claimed that commons will always fail because of incentives for all users of a common resource to take a little more than their fair share until the resource collapses. [Elinor Ostrom](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elinor_Ostrom) pointed out that Hardin was talking about a free-for-all, not a commons - for which she received a Nobel Prize. She shows that communities can develop systems of self-governance to manage resources without the need for top-down government intervention or privatization. You may have heard of [Garrett Hardin](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garrett_Hardin)'s famous essay, _the Tragedy of the Commons_, in which he claimed that commons will always fail because of incentives for all users of a common resource to take a little more than their fair share until the resource collapses. [Elinor Ostrom](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elinor_Ostrom) pointed out that Hardin was talking about a free-for-all, not a commons - for which she received a Nobel Prize. She shows that communities can develop systems of self-governance to manage resources without the need for top-down government intervention or privatization.
Line 35: Line 36:
 <caption> <caption>
 _Elinor Ostrom, whose work made it clear that commoning is not about a ‘free-for-all’, but responsible governance of resources. Image: [Holger Motzkau](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Prolineserver), [CC-by-SA-3.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/)._ _Elinor Ostrom, whose work made it clear that commoning is not about a ‘free-for-all’, but responsible governance of resources. Image: [Holger Motzkau](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Prolineserver), [CC-by-SA-3.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/)._
- 
 </caption> </caption>
  
Line 43: Line 43:
 In _Governing the Commons_ (see further resources), Ostrom outlined principles for successful commons. To summarise: resources are not owned privately, but it's not a free-for-all either - there are boundaries and agreements so that all users (commoners) know what’s expected of them, and what they can expect to receive; commoners make and monitor the agreements themselves – they’re not imposed from above - i.e. not by the state; each local commons can fit into a larger geographical commons, and so on, up to the global scale - a movement. Here's the full list of principles. In _Governing the Commons_ (see further resources), Ostrom outlined principles for successful commons. To summarise: resources are not owned privately, but it's not a free-for-all either - there are boundaries and agreements so that all users (commoners) know what’s expected of them, and what they can expect to receive; commoners make and monitor the agreements themselves – they’re not imposed from above - i.e. not by the state; each local commons can fit into a larger geographical commons, and so on, up to the global scale - a movement. Here's the full list of principles.
  
-### Ostrom’s commons principles+==== Ostrom’s commons principles ====
  
 1. **Clearly defined boundaries:** commoners understand what resources they have responsibility for, and who with. 1. **Clearly defined boundaries:** commoners understand what resources they have responsibility for, and who with.
Line 74: Line 74:
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
  
-### New commons ideas+==== New commons ideas ====
  
 There are new tools and ideas that allow us to: There are new tools and ideas that allow us to:
Line 94: Line 94:
  
 <caption> <caption>
-In a commons economy, mutual credit is a tool for accounting for exchange, but it doesn’t provide a store of value. Future-use vouchers (a.k.a. ‘use-credit obligations’) can be used to save / store value / provide non-monetary pensions.+_In a commons economy, mutual credit is a tool for accounting for exchange, but it doesn’t provide a store of value. Future-use vouchers (a.k.a. ‘use-credit obligations’) can be used to save / store value / provide non-monetary pensions._
  
 </caption> </caption>
Line 101: Line 101:
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
  
-### What’s happening already?+==== What’s happening already? ====
  
 Under feudalism, ‘commoners’ had rights on land owned by the Crown, nobility or the church, to graze animals, collect firewood etc. Ending such rights – by legal acts of [enclosure](https://www.thelandmagazine.org.uk/articles/short-history-enclosure-britain) – was part of the transition to capitalism. An estimated 2 billion people today still depend for at least part of their livelihood on common resources. Under feudalism, ‘commoners’ had rights on land owned by the Crown, nobility or the church, to graze animals, collect firewood etc. Ending such rights – by legal acts of [enclosure](https://www.thelandmagazine.org.uk/articles/short-history-enclosure-britain) – was part of the transition to capitalism. An estimated 2 billion people today still depend for at least part of their livelihood on common resources.
Line 121: Line 121:
  
 <caption> <caption>
-Stroud Commons: inaugural event.+_Stroud Commons: inaugural event._
  
 </caption> </caption>
Line 130: Line 130:
  
  
-## What are the benefits of the commons economy?+===== What are the benefits of the commons economy? =====
  
-### Personal+==== Personal ====
  
 Local economies are reoriented towards providing: Local economies are reoriented towards providing:
Line 150: Line 150:
  
 <caption> <caption>
-An economy based on credit clearing, mutual credit and commons ownership would insulate local economies from wider financial downturns.+_An economy based on credit clearing, mutual credit and commons ownership would insulate local economies from wider financial downturns._
  
 </caption> </caption>
Line 157: Line 157:
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
  
-### Decentralising power away from corporations+==== Decentralising power away from corporations ====
  
 Once assets are in the commons, they’re never sold again, so that wealth stays in communities, rather than being extracted by corporations and concentrated. Mutual credit is the exchange system for the commons economy - it’s accounting for who’s done what for whom, rather than money (which is what’s actually extracted from communities). Once assets are in the commons, they’re never sold again, so that wealth stays in communities, rather than being extracted by corporations and concentrated. Mutual credit is the exchange system for the commons economy - it’s accounting for who’s done what for whom, rather than money (which is what’s actually extracted from communities).
Line 163: Line 163:
 By building the commons, we can start to lay the foundations of a new system. It may be the only way we can do that – we can’t vote for it, as the state and corporate sector are so entwined; protest or petitions won’t work for the same reason; there’s not going to be an ‘uprising’, and even if there were, it would be crushed, and even if it succeeded, it would mean a different group in control of centralised power. We need to build something new ourselves, in our communities. In the 19th century, the co-operative and mutual movements came close to building a new system, but co-ops needed to go into debt to obtain infrastructure, and didn’t have strong enough asset locks to prevent corporate buyout. Social connections are paramount in the commons. Attempts to change the system without considering social relations have been disastrous (communism, fascism), and attempts to change social relations without considering the system have been ineffective (hippies, self-help). By building the commons, we can start to lay the foundations of a new system. It may be the only way we can do that – we can’t vote for it, as the state and corporate sector are so entwined; protest or petitions won’t work for the same reason; there’s not going to be an ‘uprising’, and even if there were, it would be crushed, and even if it succeeded, it would mean a different group in control of centralised power. We need to build something new ourselves, in our communities. In the 19th century, the co-operative and mutual movements came close to building a new system, but co-ops needed to go into debt to obtain infrastructure, and didn’t have strong enough asset locks to prevent corporate buyout. Social connections are paramount in the commons. Attempts to change the system without considering social relations have been disastrous (communism, fascism), and attempts to change social relations without considering the system have been ineffective (hippies, self-help).
  
-### Building community and preparing for any potential collapse scenarios+==== Building community and preparing for any potential collapse scenarios ====
  
 'There may be trouble ahead'. We’re going to need to look after each other in communities, by building the commons economy to provide affordable housing, energy and other essentials, and a way to invest our savings in our communities. 'There may be trouble ahead'. We’re going to need to look after each other in communities, by building the commons economy to provide affordable housing, energy and other essentials, and a way to invest our savings in our communities.
Line 169: Line 169:
 People in communities (e.g. in Switzerland, Japan, Spain and the Philippines) where there are commons for irrigation, pasture, woodlands etc. have for centuries organised themselves to set and monitor rules, and sanction those breaking them. This has developed excellent organisational skills for community cohesion in times of shortage or hardship. People in communities (e.g. in Switzerland, Japan, Spain and the Philippines) where there are commons for irrigation, pasture, woodlands etc. have for centuries organised themselves to set and monitor rules, and sanction those breaking them. This has developed excellent organisational skills for community cohesion in times of shortage or hardship.
  
-An economy based on credit clearing, mutual credit and commons ownership would insulate local economies from wider financial downturns.+_An economy based on credit clearing, mutual credit and commons ownership would insulate local economies from wider financial downturns._
  
 Communities are strengthened and become safer, friendlier and more fun, and towns retain their character and uniqueness. Communities are strengthened and become safer, friendlier and more fun, and towns retain their character and uniqueness.
Line 175: Line 175:
 Most movements for change don't engage working-class communities - where most people live. Commons is different, because it provides affordability and jobs (management of the commons is via paid steward roles, not volunteer trustees). Most movements for change don't engage working-class communities - where most people live. Commons is different, because it provides affordability and jobs (management of the commons is via paid steward roles, not volunteer trustees).
  
-### Environment+==== Environment ====
  
 Unlike capitalism, a commons economy has short supply chains and no '[growth imperative](/stea/steady-state_economics)' and therefore might just be able to provide the things we need without completely destroying the biosphere (again, unlike capitalism). Decisions can be made to protect nature, that the profit motive overrules in corporations. Unlike capitalism, a commons economy has short supply chains and no '[growth imperative](/stea/steady-state_economics)' and therefore might just be able to provide the things we need without completely destroying the biosphere (again, unlike capitalism). Decisions can be made to protect nature, that the profit motive overrules in corporations.
Line 185: Line 185:
  
 <caption> <caption>
-The commons economy generates more (and more meaningful) jobs, managing schemes and maintaining properties / infrastructure.+_The commons economy generates more (and more meaningful) jobs, managing schemes and maintaining properties / infrastructure._
  
 </caption> </caption>
Line 192: Line 192:
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
  
-## What can I do?+===== What can I do? =====
  
 If you live in or around Stroud, you can [contact Stroud Commons](https://stroudcommons.org/contact/) if you’d like to get involved – as a volunteer / commons builder, investor, customer or steward (employee to manage / maintain the commons). If you live in or around Stroud, you can [contact Stroud Commons](https://stroudcommons.org/contact/) if you’d like to get involved – as a volunteer / commons builder, investor, customer or steward (employee to manage / maintain the commons).
Line 220: Line 220:
 Subscribe to our newsletter for commons news; comment on the blog, or [send us an article](http://lowimpactorg.onyx-sites.io/blog-article-social-media-policy/); and of course, please share this page with anyone you think might be interested. We’d like to invite everyone to be a commoner! Subscribe to our newsletter for commons news; comment on the blog, or [send us an article](http://lowimpactorg.onyx-sites.io/blog-article-social-media-policy/); and of course, please share this page with anyone you think might be interested. We’d like to invite everyone to be a commoner!
  
 +===== Forum =====
  
-## Further resources+This topic belongs to the section [[gt:economy|Economy & finance]]. You can ask questions or add information on the corresponding [Forum section](https://forum.growingthecommons.org/t/economy).
  
-- Elinor Ostrom's [_Governing the Commons_](http://lowimpactorg.onyx-sites.io/wp-content/uploads/ostrom_1990.pdf) (pdf) +===== Further resources ===== 
-- Here’s more about [‘commoning’](/comg/commoning),  [housing commons](/hoco/Housing_commons), [energy commons](http://lowimpactorg.onyx-sites.io/posts/how-to-build-an-energy-commons), [climbing commons](http://climbingcommons.org/), [friendly societies](http://lowimpactorg.onyx-sites.io/posts/bear-ye-one-anothers-burdens-friendly-societies-for-social-welfare) (social care commons) and [here’s a longer article](http://lowimpactorg.onyx-sites.io/posts/replacing-capitalism-the-why-what-how-and-who-of-growing-the-commons-economy) about the why, what, how and who of the commons economy.+ 
 +- Elinor Ostrom's _[Governing the Commons](http://lowimpactorg.onyx-sites.io/wp-content/uploads/ostrom_1990.pdf)_ (pdf) 
 +- [friendly societies](http://lowimpactorg.onyx-sites.io/posts/bear-ye-one-anothers-burdens-friendly-societies-for-social-welfare)
 - [Credit commons](/crco/credit_commons): the 'money system' for the commons economy - [Credit commons](/crco/credit_commons): the 'money system' for the commons economy
 - [Island Power](https://www.island-power.net/) - smart accelerator for energy commons - [Island Power](https://www.island-power.net/) - smart accelerator for energy commons
 - [Mutual Credit Services](https://www.mutualcredit.services/home) - building commons models for different economic sectors - [Mutual Credit Services](https://www.mutualcredit.services/home) - building commons models for different economic sectors
-- [https://stroudcommons.org/](https://stroudcommons.org/) - implementing commons models in Stroud+- [Stroud Commons](https://stroudcommons.org/) - implementing commons models in Stroud 
 + 
 + 
 +===== Related topics ===== 
 + 
 +- [Commoning](comg:commoning) 
 +- [Mutual credit](mucr:mutual_credit) 
 +- [The democracy problem](demo:democracy) 
 +- [System change](syst:system_change) 
 +- [Free & open source software](foss:open_source) 
 +- [Community-supported agriculture](csas:community-supported_agriculture) 
 +- [Community energy](coen:community_energy) 
 +- [Community land trusts](clts:community_land_trusts) 
 +- [Housing commons](hoco:housing_commons) 
 +- [Co-ops](coop:co-operatives) 
 +- [Self-employment](self:self-employment) 
 +- [Use-credit obligations](ucos:use-credit_obligations) 
 +- [Credit clearing](crcl:credit_clearing) 
 +- [Wikis](wiks:wikis) 
 +- [Credit commons](crco:credit_commons) 
 +- [ROSCAs - rotating savings & credit associations](rosc:roscas)
  
 +===== Specialist curators of this topic =====
  
-## Specialists 
  
  • coec/commons_economy.1765031018.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2025/12/06 14:23
  • by Dave Darby