Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
| cofi:collaborative_finance [2026/05/29 14:44] – [What can I do?] Dave Darby | cofi:collaborative_finance [2026/06/06 07:44] (current) – [Related topics] Simon Grant | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| The commons movement is a backlash to the idea of private property, in which ownership of land and other assets is exclusive, which gradually splits society into classes of owners and of the dispossessed. But ownership is just a part of the problem. | The commons movement is a backlash to the idea of private property, in which ownership of land and other assets is exclusive, which gradually splits society into classes of owners and of the dispossessed. But ownership is just a part of the problem. | ||
| - | Collaborative Finance addresses another dimension of the problem, which is how the the money and financial system puts the state, its institutions and its plutocrats between people struggling to make a living, skimming and confiscating their resources at every turn. | + | Collaborative Finance addresses another dimension of the problem, which is how the money and financial system puts the state, its institutions and its plutocrats between people struggling to make a living, skimming and confiscating their resources at every turn. |
| - | Lets consider some common, even essential, financial instruments: | + | Let' |
| * Insurance | * Insurance | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
| These mechanisms' | These mechanisms' | ||
| - | Meanwhile for most of us the financial services have become like indifferent machines; algorithms decide if we are credit worthy; our pensions are used to finance polluting industry and war-criminal governments; | + | Meanwhile, for most of us the financial services have become like indifferent machines: algorithms decide if we are creditworthy; our pensions are used to finance polluting industry and war-criminal governments; |
| - | Being organised at such a large scale ensures that only remote rich people design these systems and derive all the secondary benefits. But what if there was a more appropriate scale, in which trust actually played a role, in which profit was not the prime directive and was ploughed back into the system? In which the people taking risks helped to manage those risks? What if the so-called free market had space for small-scale financial services? House and car insurance in every street. What if pensions were managed by the local government which, after all is the provider of elderly care. What if we could invest in the very businesses that produce and sell our necessities, | + | Being organised at such a large scale ensures that only remote rich people design these systems and derive all the secondary benefits. But what if there was a more appropriate scale, in which trust actually played a role, in which profit was not the prime directive and was ploughed back into the system? In which the people taking risks helped to manage those risks? What if the so-called free market had space for small-scale financial services? House and car insurance in every street? What if pensions were managed by the local government which, after all, is the provider of elderly care? What if we could invest in the very businesses that produce and sell our necessities, |
| One of the first assumptions we unpack is about the role of [[cofi: | One of the first assumptions we unpack is about the role of [[cofi: | ||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
| ---- | ---- | ||
| - | Mainstream finance is optimised to maximise profit for the owners by maximising revenue for the customers, at least as far as the cartel allows. The benefits of doing it another way then, are everything but maximal revenue! Instead finance done collaboratively between peers should be less fearful, more flexible and less legalistic, more fun, more participative, | + | Mainstream finance is optimised to maximise profit for the owners by maximising revenue for the customers, at least as far as the cartel allows. The benefits of doing it another way, then, are everything but maximal revenue! Instead finance done collaboratively between peers should be less fearful, more flexible and less legalistic, more fun, more participative, |
| - | This is the dream, but the obstacles are many. Most people are very conservative with their money and the incumbent system is the devil they know, it is more or less predictable, | + | This is the dream, but the obstacles are many. Most people are very conservative with their money and the incumbent system is the devil they know; it is more or less predictable, |
| Another challenge is finding each other and building real, trusting relationships. The people who are awake to the menace of the financial system are thinly spread, which makes it hard for them to meet, to associate, to build trust and to build institutions. | Another challenge is finding each other and building real, trusting relationships. The people who are awake to the menace of the financial system are thinly spread, which makes it hard for them to meet, to associate, to build trust and to build institutions. | ||
| Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
| * **Security** is emotional and relational, not just physical. | * **Security** is emotional and relational, not just physical. | ||
| - | With this grounding you can work with others to create wealth and security together. Building large scale, trustworthy institutions from scratch takes years or even decades of patience, yet commoners have achieved it many times before. [[.:https:// | + | /* make some of these into concepts */ |
| + | |||
| + | With this grounding you can work with others to create wealth and security together. Building large-scale, trustworthy institutions from scratch takes years or even decades of patience, yet commoners have achieved it many times before. [[bsoc: | ||
| So building a more collaborative financial system can only happen gradually, cautiously, even if you feel the need for it painfully urgently. Even if you never achieve it, the process itself should be immensely valuable for building trust and community around you. | So building a more collaborative financial system can only happen gradually, cautiously, even if you feel the need for it painfully urgently. Even if you never achieve it, the process itself should be immensely valuable for building trust and community around you. | ||
| Line 63: | Line 65: | ||
| Here we point to some examples of new and established projects. | Here we point to some examples of new and established projects. | ||
| - | The Local Exchange Trading Systems (LETS) is where it started for many of us: local groups serving each other and keeping account using abstract accounting units. The heyday was the 1990s, but many groups remain. | + | The Local Exchange Trading Systems (LETS) |
| - | Any [ecovillage](https:// | + | Any [ecovillage](https:// |
| A newer project, [Kin coop](https:// | A newer project, [Kin coop](https:// | ||
| Line 71: | Line 73: | ||
| In Stroud, UK the team that built this wiki [Stroud Commons](https:// | In Stroud, UK the team that built this wiki [Stroud Commons](https:// | ||
| - | [Local Loop Liverpool](https:// | + | [Local Loop Merseyside](https:// |
| The [Economic Space Agency](https:// | The [Economic Space Agency](https:// | ||
| Line 80: | Line 82: | ||
| - | - [Blockchain](bloc: | + | - [Blockchain](bloc: |
| - [Building societies](bsoc: | - [Building societies](bsoc: | ||
| - [Commons economy](coec: | - [Commons economy](coec: | ||
| Line 86: | Line 88: | ||
| - [Credit commons](crco: | - [Credit commons](crco: | ||
| - [Credit unions](crun: | - [Credit unions](crun: | ||
| - | - [Cryptocurrencies](cryp: | + | - [Cryptocurrencies](cryp: |
| - [Local currencies](lcur: | - [Local currencies](lcur: | ||
| - [Mutual credit](mucr: | - [Mutual credit](mucr: | ||
| Line 96: | Line 98: | ||
| ---- | ---- | ||
| * [[user: | * [[user: | ||
| + | * [[user: | ||
| + | |||