Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| buil:building_societies [2025/12/17 11:26] – created - external edit 127.0.0.1 | buil:building_societies [2025/12/17 15:41] (current) – removed asimong | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | # Building societies | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - |  societies were formed, and by the turn of the century there were almost 2000 UK societies with over 600,000 members. | ||
| - | |||
| - | The industry grew steadily until the 1980s when it was hit by a wave of exremely damaging ‘demutualisations’. | ||
| - | |||
| - | <WRAP center centeralign> | ||
| - | < | ||
| - | {{url> | ||
| - | < | ||
| - | _The Newcastle Building Society opened a branch inside Yarm library, North Yorkshire, to prevent its closure._ | ||
| - | </ | ||
| - | </ | ||
| - | </ | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | ### Demutualisation | ||
| - | |||
| - | Many building societies were ‘demutualised’, | ||
| - | |||
| - | Vince Cable called the demutualisation of building societies ‘one of the greatest acts of economic vandalism in modern times’. It has resulted in the loss of hundreds of small building societies, converted or swallowed up by the corporate sector. This is the opposite direction to the one we should be moving in if we don’t want banks and financial institutions that are ‘too big to fail’, although of course the motivation behind deregulation was ideological rather than economic. | ||
| - | |||
| - | <WRAP center centeralign> | ||
| - | < | ||
| - | ._ | ||
| - | </ | ||
| - | |||
| - | </ | ||
| - | </ | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | ## What are the benefits of building societies? | ||
| - | |||
| - | Profits are only distributed to staff and to members of the society, they are not creamed off for shareholders. For this reason, they are often able to offer competitive rates for savings accounts and mortgages. | ||
| - | |||
| - | They are democratic institutions – i.e. one member, one vote, rather than one share, one vote, as with PLCs. So your influence in the society does not depend on how much money you have. | ||
| - | |||
| - | They are ethical places to put your money. From Positive Money: ‘building societies are prohibited by law from engaging in commodities or foreign exchange trading. So if you give your money to Nationwide or Coventry Building Society, they won’t use it to push up the price of food to the point where people in developing countries starve. That’s a nice thought!’ | ||
| - | |||
| - | <WRAP center centeralign> | ||
| - | < | ||
| - |  current account to a building society. Lots of people organise their mortgages through a broker, and if that’s the case, you can stipulate that you’d like to use a building society. If they don’t understand your ethical reasons for doing so, you’ll then have the opportunity to educate them. | ||
| - | |||
| - | Current accounts are expensive for financial institutions to operate, but for current accounts, you have two options – the [Nationwide](https:// | ||
| - | |||
| - | <WRAP center centeralign> | ||
| - | < | ||
| - | . You’ll have the right to nominate and vote for directors, or to stand for election yourself (as long as you get enough support from other members), and to attend the AGM. | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | ## Further resources | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | ## Specialist curators of this topic | ||
| - | |||
| - | **Thanks to Hilary McVitty of the [Building Societies Association](https:// | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | _Date on Lowimpact: | ||